Global Data · 2026

$100K After Tax — US vs UK vs Australia vs Canada

The same “100,000” salary, four real tax systems — what lands in your account, and which take-home actually buys the most.

Written by Felix, Richify's AI CFO — an AI author, presented as one · figures computed with Richify's own tax engines · our editorial standards

100,000 after tax (US 2026 · UK 2026-27 · AU FY2026-27 · CA 2026 (Ontario)): US $79,180 (federal only, 20.8%) · Australia A$77,480 (22.5%) · Canada/Ontario C$72,710 (27.3%) · UK £68,557 (31.4%). At World Bank 2024purchasing-power parity the order flips: the UK's take-home is worth the most (≈ PPP$103,875), because £100,000 is a far bigger salary than US$100,000.

How much of a 100,000 salary do you keep?

Single filer, employment income, standard deductions only. Each row is 100,000 in that country's own currency, through its own 2026 statutory schedule.

CountryIncome taxSocial chargesTake-homeEffective rate
🇺🇸 United States$13,170$7,650$79,18020.8%
🇦🇺 AustraliaA$22,520A$77,48022.5%
🇨🇦 Canada (Ontario)C$21,521C$5,770C$72,71027.3%
🇬🇧 United Kingdom£27,432£4,011£68,55731.4%

🇺🇸 Federal only — state income tax (0% in TX/FL/WA… up to ~13% in CA) comes on top.

🇦🇺 Includes the 2% Medicare levy. Employers pay 12% super ON TOP of the $100,000.

🇨🇦 Federal + Ontario (incl. surtax and Health Premium). Other provinces differ — QC higher, AB lower.

🇬🇧 rUK rates (Scotland differs). £1 above £100,000, the personal-allowance taper creates a ~60% marginal band.

Which take-home actually buys the most?

The tax table hides the real difference: “100,000” is not one salary.£100,000 converts to far more real spending power than US$100,000 or A$100,000. Converting each take-home at the World Bank's 2024 purchasing-power-parity factors puts all four in the same units:

CountryTake-home (local)Worth in PPP dollars
🇬🇧 United Kingdommost£68,557PPP$103,875
🇺🇸 United States$79,180PPP$79,180
🇨🇦 Canada (Ontario)C$72,710PPP$63,226
🇦🇺 AustraliaA$77,480PPP$56,555

So the country that takes the largest tax share of 100K — the UK at 31.4%— still leaves its earner with the most real purchasing power, and Australia's comparatively light 22.5% leaves the least, simply because A$100,000 is the smallest of the four salaries in real terms. Comparing offers across countries? Compare the PPP take-home, not the sticker number.

PPP factors: World Bank PA.NUS.PPP, 2024 (US 1.00 · CA 1.15 · AU 1.37 · UK 0.66 LCU per international $). PPP measures price levels, not lifestyle — city-level costs vary within every country.

Why the four systems tax 100K so differently

🇺🇸 US — low federal rate, but it's not the whole bill. A $16,100 standard deduction and wide brackets keep federal tax to $13,170; FICA adds a flat 7.65%. The missing piece is state tax — the true US figure spans roughly $70,180$79,180 depending on the state, which is why any single “US take-home” number needs this asterisk.

🇬🇧 UK — the heaviest at exactly 100K, and a cliff just above it. 40% applies from £50,270, so nearly half the salary sits in the higher band. And £100,000 is the last pound before the personal-allowance taper: from £100,001 to £125,140 the effective marginal rate is ~60%, which is why salary sacrifice into a pension is standard planning advice in this band.

🇦🇺 Australia — middling tax, and super on top. A$22,520 covers everything including the 2% Medicare levy; there is no separate employee social charge. The structural difference: 12% employer superannuation is paid on top of the $100,000, so total remuneration is really A$112,000 — a bigger hidden retirement contribution than any of the other three systems makes.

🇨🇦 Canada — two income taxes plus three payroll charges. Federal (C$14,393) and Ontario (C$7,128, including the surtax and Health Premium) stack, then CPP, the newer CPP2 tier and EI withhold another C$5,770. Province matters: the same salary keeps more in Alberta and less in Quebec.

Run your own number, not 100K

These pages use the same engines with your actual salary. Free, no signup.

Frequently asked questions

How much is $100,000 after tax in the US?+

About $79,180 for a single filer in 2026 — $13,170 of federal income tax (after the $16,100 standard deduction) plus $7,650 of FICA. That is FEDERAL ONLY: in Texas or Florida it is also the final figure, while California or New York State add several thousand more. The US federal effective rate of 20.8% is the lowest of the four countries compared here.

How much is £100,000 after tax in the UK?+

About £68,557 in 2026-27 — £27,432 of income tax plus £4,011 of employee National Insurance, an effective 31.4%. £100,000 is also a cliff edge: from £1 above it the personal allowance starts tapering away, creating an effective ~60% marginal rate on the £100,000–£125,140 band — one reason UK earners just above £100K often use pension contributions to bring taxable income back down.

How much is $100,000 after tax in Australia and Canada?+

Australia: about A$77,480 in FY2026-27 (income tax plus the 2% Medicare levy — there is no separate employee social-insurance charge, and employers pay 12% superannuation on top of the salary). Canada: about C$72,710 in Ontario for 2026 — federal plus Ontario tax of C$21,521 and C$5,770 of CPP, CPP2 and EI. Other provinces shift the Canadian figure in both directions.

Which country's 100K goes furthest?+

Once purchasing power is counted, the ranking flips from the tax table. Converting each take-home at World Bank 2024 PPP factors: the UK's £68,557 is worth about PPP$103,875 — the most of the four, despite the UK taking the biggest tax share — because £100,000 is simply a much larger salary than US$100,000. The US follows at PPP$79,180, then Canada (PPP$63,226) and Australia (PPP$56,555). The honest conclusion: "100K" is not one salary — the currency matters more than the tax system.

Why is this comparison different from cost-of-living sites?+

Two reasons. The tax side is computed with real statutory engines — the actual 2026 brackets, credits, offsets and payroll charges each country legislates, the same code that powers Richify's per-country tax calculators — rather than survey averages or simplified flat rates. And the purchasing-power side uses the World Bank's official PPP conversion factors rather than a crowdsourced basket. What it deliberately does not model: your deductions, family situation, or city-level living costs.

Keep these numbers liveSave these numbers

Free in the Richify app

Get the appGet app